Friday, January 29, 2010

Extending...whatever you will...


On the night of the State of the Union address, I must admit, I was not at home listening to the talking heads of all political stripes prognosticating on what the president would say. I fear I agreed most with an early aside from an NPR commentator who said that this speech has largely turned into Kabuki theater. Applause analysis and the meaning of who jumps to their feet and when and why...well, I just fail to see the point. I can read the speech the next day; we pretty much knew what he was going to say: Times are bad. Suck it up. If it weren't for the pleasure of seeing and hearing an articulate president again, I'd skip the whole thing.

However, politics is not the tangent I wish to pursue--at least now. Instead of paying rapt attention to our TV screen, JC and I went to the opening reception for an exhibit at the Folger Library: Extending the Book. I was not overly excited by the prospect, but as with so many things that JC is interested in (there ARE exceptions, however), I was very glad that I went. The extension that the exhibit addressed was the pastime of essentially embellishing the content of books, adding information, illustrations, and sometimes, whole pamphlets relating to the text. It is, in a bizarre way, like adding footnotes to a text, though on a much larger scale. The additions put a personal spin on the book, much as handwritten notes in the margin would do.

Naturally, this "Graingerization" (named after the Mr. Grainger who popularized the activity) was particularly popular with the works of Shakespeare, incorporating portraits of actors and actresses, and even accounts and letters relating to parties given for them and for the productions they were engaged in. It was really quite fascinating to see the ephemera that people thought interesting enough to include in (and actually bind into) their books.

I couldn't help but imagine the results if the practice had continued to the present day. My organic chemistry text, laced with portraits of the dour chemists who had spent their youth perfecting reactions, perhaps a photo of the beach that I fantasized about in that class in the dead of winter..maybe even a few handwritten lab reports or notes of my own on the class...these would have been the stuff with which I Graingerized my text.

In fact, without knowing the name for it, I have a host of 'extended' books. I long ago made a point of annotating my collection of cookbooks with notes as to who had been served with what recipe, and many recipes bear my own opinions on the results I obtained.. some not so enthusiastic. I also have a habit of inserting various pieces of paper into the books at my favorite pages. I might find a birthday card I enjoyed, or a drawing or note from Kay or Sarah when they were small. There might be an envelope with a half-finished letter that takes me back to what was going on when I first essayed the recipe. More likely, the page has its own 'attachments'--spilled ingredients, teacup-sized rings, and wrinkled pages whose hard use indicates many preparations.

Upon further thought, I also remembered that I have a tendency to extend my own writing, even here--with photos, with illustrations, with different fonts that further contribute to the point, the mood, the information I'm attempting to convey.

In any case, the Folger exhibit is well worth a visit. It informs, it teaches, and even more importantly, it makes you think. A triple threat in this world of idiot TV and Kabuki politics.


Friday, January 22, 2010

Velveeta

This week, I was at a gathering of young women--and by 'young', I mean women who refuse to grow old, no matter what their ages, who are as sharp and current as this morning's newspaper (which they read) and are, to a woman, far more interesting to listen to than any commentator who appears on my television. In any case, we meet once a month for a bag lunch and conversation, for book and theater and film recommendations, and discussion of issues ranging from election results to global catastrophes. It is a great and worthy group, and I consider myself fortunate indeed to be included.

My sandwich yesterday was a purchased grilled cheese, as I was coming from an appointment and had just enough time to stop by a favorite cafe and pick it up. This sparked a discussion of the shop, grilled cheese, cheese in general, Philly cheesesteaks, favorite food sources, supermarkets and where the next Wegman's was to be built. But somewhere in the wide range of conversations that erupted, the subject of Velveeta arose, and with it, some confessions of the guilty pleasures of comfort foods we enjoyed as children.

It is a poor child indeed who has never enjoyed on a cold day the warm solace of a bowl of Campbell's tomato soup (preferably made with milk) and a crunchy, buttery, gooey grilled cheese sandwich on the side. (Potato chips and pickle are optional.) Most of my friends did not admit to purchasing Velveeta, but all remembered it and all the quick-fix recipes from the pre-gourmet era that included it in their list of ingredients. What easier sauce, what more adaptable product could one find, aside from cream of mushroom soup?

I cannot tell a lie. I am never without a package of Velveeta cheese slices in my refrigerator. They get rolled up like pinwheels in biscuit dough to top my tuna casserole; they are added to my scrambled eggs; they are mixed in (with a little milk) with vegetables for a quickie cheese sauce; they are there for quick cheeseburgers or chili cheese-dogs...and always, always, always for grilled cheese sandwiches. I wouldn't have it any other way.

Ode to Velveeta

O creamy wonder of the past!

Where have you gone?

Who will praise you in this brave new world

of natural, unadulterated products,

in this barren foodscape bereft of color,

preservative and additive?

Who has not luxuriated

in your gooey grilled cheese

with steaming tomato soup on a chilly day—

or longingly dreamed of mac and cheese

devoid of blue box and yellow powder?

You are the sine qua non of tuna melts,

the quintessential ingredient

in fine con quesos, and yet…

you stand without honor,

banished from the pantheon of comfort food.

O yellow box! O foil-wrapped brick!

Return once more to your rightful place

inside our refrigerator door…

Melt and pour in a golden stream,

gilding our pasta, Krafting our cheesesteaks,

oozing o’er hot dogs (with mustard and relish)

Spread your yellow cloak and offer disguise

to loathsome vegetables…

Children, young and old,

will bless you once again.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

Here's Hoping...

It has been a hard winter, and according to the calendar, we're only a month into the season. I take heart in the fact that usually January is the nadir of the year--and that it is now half over. Easter is early this year, and, while that may not mean anything to the weather demons, it provides at least a breath of hope that spring will not be far behind. And I do hope.

Hope is something we need right now--a budding confidence that things will be different in the coming year. Resolutions always seem to me to be fraught with the possibility of failure, and personal failure, at that. Whereas hope seems to be a little more gentle, a bit more forgiving. I can work to make my hopes realities, but I can be content with small advances. Resolutions always seem to me to be all-or-nothing, labor-intensive propositions. It's easy to give up on resolutions, but much, much more difficult to give up hope. So, instead of New Year's resolutions this year, I propose a new tradition: hopes for spring.

This year, I hope for a better country.
  • I hope for representation I can believe in, a government that believes in the power of its citizens, and citizens who believe in their government, and can accept that there will be no quick fixes for the problems that beset us. I hope for patience for us all.
  • I hope for a kinder, gentler media to replace the attack dogs and scandal-scavengers we now employ.
  • I hope for greater respect among our political office-holders-- for themselves, for each other, for their constituents.
  • And I might as well hope, while I'm at it, for the same for everyone. When it comes right down to it, a little self-respect and respect for others would do a world of good nowadays.
  • I hope for a return to some old values--not the George Bush version of 'family values' that translated to rabid conservatism, or (God forbid) the Sarah Palin crazy-quilt of sound bites that purported to express a value framework.
  • What I hope for is much more simple: truth, integrity, kindness, tolerance, a work ethic that binds both employee and employer, a social conscience, loyalty, faith, responsibility...and once again, respect all round.

For myself,
  • I hope for peace and good health and independence for all my family;
  • I hope that we continue to have the support we all need from family and friends.
  • I hope for wisdom to make good decisions, for the strength to follow through on my obligations, and for the humility to be grateful for the many gifts and blessings I enjoy.

Of course, all the other resolution-esque 'hopes' are there: losing weight, getting rid of clutter, more exercise, less Facebooking...but they may have already crossed the border into 'pipedreams'. Maybe what I've needed is a bigger canvas. Maybe what I've needed is hope.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Be careful what you wish for...


Perhaps it was only coincidence that yesterday morning, a truck appeared at the end of our alley and deposited a real live dumpster on the street. It is for the use of the renovation crew working on the house at the top of our alley, but it DID give me a turn....

Saturday, January 2, 2010

New Year's Irresolution

Ah, the New Year! And instead of Christmas' "visions of sugarplums", I am dreaming of a dumpster. I have visions of JC and me tossing decades of unnecessary stuff out the windows of this house into the yawning maw of a deep green dumpster that someone will come and haul away. Life would be so much simpler; our house would have so much more room if we could only let go of all this STUFF.

The problem, I think, is not emotional attachment so much as it is financial memory. How can I simply throw away items that I paid good money for not so long ago. (BTW, what does the phrase 'good money' mean? If it was something I didn't need, wasn't that expenditure 'BAD money'???) I have an aversion to tossing things that I might have to buy again later. Or things that I might want to share with a friend or family member sometime--like audiobooks. Let's face it. I have an aversion to throwing almost anything away. I have to overcome it.

One of the best methods for divesting ourselves of stuff is to move to a new house. When faced with the prospect of paying someone to pack and transport things we haven't looked at in decades, it's a little easier to part with whatever it is. And after the fact, one can always shrug and say, "We must have lost it in the move.." and forget about it. But that solution is only a temporary one, and not exactly efficient, anyway.

The other factor in retaining our junk is the sheer physical effort of removing it. Working my way through closets and dresser drawers and shelves and cupboards..transferring stuff to bags or boxes and hauling them up and down stairs, to the car, to the trash, to the Salvation Army, to the recycling center...This is a mountainous task, and I feel as if I am required to move it, a teaspoonful at a time. There are far too many other interesting things to do than move mountains, particularly one that involves decision-making with every teaspoonful removed.

What we need is an arbitrary decision-maker: someone who will heartlessly label the junk for what it is, will call in their minions to jettison it in whatever direction is most appropriate, and will leave us with empty closets and cupboards and shelves....and relieved of the burden of unnecessary belongings.

I can dream.